Skip to main content

How are the Burmese people marginalized/silenced throughout George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant"?

In "Shooting An Elephant," the Burmese people are marginalized and silenced by the British in a number of ways. We see this most clearly in the second paragraph when Orwell describes life in Burma under British control. Orwell himself describes the British as the "oppressors" and graphically describes the imprisonment of the locals:



The wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lock-ups.



Furthermore, from his description, we learn that the British use extreme violence to discipline these prisoners, as Orwell has witnessed first-hand:



The scarred buttocks of the men who had been Bogged with bamboos.



Finally, through Orwell's response to the escaped elephant, we see another form of marginalization at play: Orwell patrols the town of Moulmein with his rifle, "an old .44 Winchester." That Orwell and other British officers are armed with such weapons demonstrates that the British are prepared to silence the Burmese using any means necessary.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more