Skip to main content

What are the themes of "The Explosion"? What do you understand about the poem? What is Larkin trying to get through to the reader?

"The Explosion" by Philip Larkin was written in response to accounts of mining disasters. There are actually two sources Larking used, a BBC documentary on mining aired in December 1969 and a song, “The Trimdon Grange Explosion” by Thomas “Tommy” Armstrong, about a disaster at Trimdon, a coal mine near Durham, England on 15 February 1882, in which 74 people were killed.


The main theme of the poem is the contrast between everyday life and disaster. The instant before the disaster, there is no sense, as there would be in a heroic epic, of impending doom. Instead, the miners are going about their ordinary business, mainly concerned with foraging for extra food. The environment surrounding the mine appears cheerfully pastoral, with larks and cows. 


The explosion occurs in a single, almost transcendent instant, connecting the ordinary with tragic grandeur. At such moments, the poem suggests, only religion contains the necessary iconography and language to respond to the situation. Larkin imagines the scene of the explosion as almost transfigurative with the surviving wives seeing the miners as almost portrayed like the saints of stained glass windows or Byzantine mosaics:



Larger than in life they managed –


Gold as on a coin, or walking


Somehow from the sun towards them,



The tremor of the explosion only momentarily affects the cows, and the lark's eggs that a miner had gathered remained unbroken, suggesting that what appears to us to be great tragedies are only momentary disturbances from the point of view of the natural world or of eternity. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more