Skip to main content

What are the themes of "The Explosion"? What do you understand about the poem? What is Larkin trying to get through to the reader?

"The Explosion" by Philip Larkin was written in response to accounts of mining disasters. There are actually two sources Larking used, a BBC documentary on mining aired in December 1969 and a song, “The Trimdon Grange Explosion” by Thomas “Tommy” Armstrong, about a disaster at Trimdon, a coal mine near Durham, England on 15 February 1882, in which 74 people were killed.


The main theme of the poem is the contrast between everyday life and disaster. The instant before the disaster, there is no sense, as there would be in a heroic epic, of impending doom. Instead, the miners are going about their ordinary business, mainly concerned with foraging for extra food. The environment surrounding the mine appears cheerfully pastoral, with larks and cows. 


The explosion occurs in a single, almost transcendent instant, connecting the ordinary with tragic grandeur. At such moments, the poem suggests, only religion contains the necessary iconography and language to respond to the situation. Larkin imagines the scene of the explosion as almost transfigurative with the surviving wives seeing the miners as almost portrayed like the saints of stained glass windows or Byzantine mosaics:



Larger than in life they managed –


Gold as on a coin, or walking


Somehow from the sun towards them,



The tremor of the explosion only momentarily affects the cows, and the lark's eggs that a miner had gathered remained unbroken, suggesting that what appears to us to be great tragedies are only momentary disturbances from the point of view of the natural world or of eternity. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more