Skip to main content

Why were the Allies victorious in World War Two?

Please note that different people might attribute the Allied victory in WWII to different factors.  I suggest that you consult your text and/or class notes to see if your instructor expects a specific answer here.  My own view is that there are at least four main reasons why the Allies were able to win WWII.  These are 1) the population and industrial power of the US, 2) the geographic size and large population of the USSR, 3) the presence of Britain as an Allied land off the coast of Europe, and 4) the mistakes made by the Axis.


The Axis made many important mistakes that helped the Allies win the war.  Hitler made a huge mistake when he launched his invasion of the Soviet Union.  One can argue that the Japanese should never have attacked Pearl Harbor, bringing the US into the war.  After the Pearl Harbor attack, the US declared war on Japan, but not on Germany.  Hitler then made another mistake by declaring war on the US, making it certain that the US would start to fight in Europe.  All of these mistakes helped the Allies win the war.


When Hitler invaded the USSR, it was a mistake because of the huge expanse of Soviet land and the country’s large population.  The Soviets were able to trade space for time, preventing the Germans from defeating them before winter came.  They were also able to throw huge numbers of soldiers at the Germans, making up for their technological and tactical inferiority with numbers.  If it had not been for the size and population of the Soviet Union, the Allies would have been much weaker.


The United States also had a large population that it could throw into the war.  Perhaps more importantly, it had a tremendous industrial base.  It could pump out massive amounts of weapons and other materiel that it could use for its own military and that it could share with its allies.  The US’s industrial base (and invulnerability to attack) also allowed it to create the atomic bombs which ended the war in the Pacific.


Finally, the Allies won because Britain was, in essence, an unsinkable aircraft carrier and supply depot off the coast of Europe.  (We might say that another Axis mistake was Hitler’s failure to invade England.)  Once the US entered the war, the Allies could build up a huge force in Britain, waiting until the time was right to invade Europe and eventually destroy Germany.


While other people can cite other factors, these are the four factors that, in my mind, are most responsible for the Allied victory in WWII.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more