Skip to main content

Can you help me with the question in the attached image?

The arrow on the DNA molecule in the image shows the hydrogen bond between complementary nucleotides. DNA stands for deoxyribonucleic acid. This definition is important because it gives away the structure. The three main components of DNA are a base, phosphate, and sugar. A single unit of DNA is called a nucleotide. Every nucleotide has the same kind phosphate and sugar type. The base is what distinguishes one nucleotide from another.


The backbone of the double helix structure is composed of both the phosphate and the sugar. The sugar is called deoxyribose, and the phosphate is `PO_4^-3` . On the image attachment, this is represented by the pentagons and circles at the top and bottom. The pentagons represent deoxyribose molecules and the circles represent phosphates.


The two strands of DNA are connected by the bases in the middle. There are four bases: adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine. Adenine only bonds with thymine and cytosine only bonds with thymine. In the image attachment, this is represented by the interlocking rectangles in the center.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.