Skip to main content

In The Crucible, how do the characters manipulate each other? What do Reverend Parris, Thomas Putnam, and Abigail Williams do?

Many characters manipulate each other in order to make personal gain. Reverend Parris, whom we first meet in Act I, seems to care more about his reputation than about the well-being of anyone in Salem, including his daughter, Betty. When the audience first hears that the girls were dancing in the woods, it is clear that Parris intends to manipulate the information to take any blame or suspicion away from himself. His first, most egregious act of manipulation is to essentially force his slave, Tituba, to confess to witchcraft (Act I) so that the blame is removed from his daughter and niece so that no one might suggest he allows such actions in his household.


While Parris is more concerned with damage control—that is, making sure that the events do not hurt his reputation—Thomas Putnam takes advantage of the situation and uses the accusations to take revenge on those he believes have wronged him. In Act I, Miller says that because of his “many grievances… it is not surprising to find that so many accusations against people are in the handwriting of Thomas Putnam.” All Putnam has to do is point an accusing finger at those against whom he holds a grudge to get them arrested and, in many cases, condemned to death.


Most would agree that no character is as manipulative as Abigail Williams. Her actions—dancing in the woods and trying to put a curse on Elizabeth Proctor—set all of the events into motion, yet she is able to place blame on others and condemn many to death. A prime example of her manipulation is with her friend, Mary Warren. In Act II, Proctor manages to convince Mary that she needs to go to the court and tell the truth. When she attempts this in Act III, saying that the girls’ actions “were pretense,” Abigail turns on her, essentially accusing Mary of performing witchcraft. Throughout the scene, Abigail puts on an act as though Mary is putting her spirit on her and tormenting her. At one point, she screams, “Oh Mary, this is a black art to change your shape” and suggests that Mary has taken the form of a bird coming to claw at her. The accusation leaves Mary Warren with little choice but to go back on her earlier statement and make it seem that Proctor forced her to lie in court. This is just one of the many examples of Abigail's manipulation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...