Skip to main content

What are some ideas for a thesis for a paper comparing "The Minister's Black Veil" and "Young Goodman Brown"?

You could argue that both stories present the idea that all human beings are inherently sinful and that we all make choices to avoid acknowledging that sinfulness for what it is; this unwillingness ultimately damages our relationships with each other and with God.


As Young Goodman Brown walks into the forest, he thinks to himself, "'[Faith] is a blessed angel on earth; and after this one night, I'll cling to her skirts and follow her to Heaven.'" But this is not the way Faith works. One cannot simply put one's faith down and pick it back up again when it suits. We cannot voluntarily and cheerfully commit sin simply because we believe that faith and piety will be available to us later. This is not being honest, and it's like trying to trick God. In the story, Brown's strategy doesn't work. He is never able to regain his faith in the end.


Similarly, Mr. Hooper's congregation understands, on some level, that his veil represents "secret sin," as this is the subject of his first sermon after he begins to wear the veil; each of us has a secret sinful nature that we try to conceal from ourselves, each other, and even God. However, the parishioners seem to quail before even asking him, explicitly, about the veil's meaning, because they do not want to hear the answer. Even Mr. Hooper's fiancee, Elizabeth, comes to understand it, and—when she does—she leaves him forever. No one in the town is willing to be honest, except for Mr. Hooper, and he is alienated for the remainder of his life as a result. In the end, their strategy of denial and ostracism fails, and he calls them all out, saying,



"When the friend shows his inmost heart to his friend; the lover to his best beloved; when man does not vainly shrink from the eye of his Creator, loathsomely treasuring up the secret of his sin; then deem me a monster, for the symbol beneath which I have lived, and die! I look around me, and, lo! on every visage a Black Veil!"



They are all sinful, and yet they all attempt to hide their sin. Essentially, they lie, and this adds sin on top of sin, compounding their souls' wrongs.


In both stories, characters understand their inherent sinfulness, but choose to ignore their own role, their own agency, in choosing sin. It is one thing for sinfulness to be part of human nature, but it is quite another to recognize one's sinfulness and do nothing to change it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more