Skip to main content

In what ways do the stories in The Bloody Chamber challenge patriarchal values in society?

In The Bloody Chamber, Angela Carter’s collection of gothic, feminist retellings of classic fairy tales subverts patriarchal values by recasting women as the main protagonists of the stories rather than marginal characters on the periphery of the tales. By foregrounding the experiences of her female protagonists, Carter shows that the fairy tales that inspire her work uphold patriarchal values. Fairy tales often cast women as victims or monsters; she challenges these expectations by placing women in prominent roles in her gothic interpretations.


For instance, in “The Tiger’s Bride,” the young female protagonist is initially presented as a “damsel in distress,” as a victim. However, she shows a strength that is not typical of women in fairy tales. Indeed, when The Beast admits that he values her because she is a virgin, she sardonically thinks



“I wish I’d rolled in the hay with every lad on my father’s farm, to disqualify myself from this humiliating bargain” (61).



She disregards the norms surrounding normative femininity by being in touch with her dormant sexuality, until the sexual, powerful being within her emerges at the end of the text.


Likewise, in “The Werewolf,” Carter’s retelling of “Little Red Riding Hood,” Little Red is no longer cast as a victim. She instead emerges as a woman who is unafraid of violence, who can handle herself in a violent place. She wounds the titular werewolf in an altercation:



“It went for her throat, as wolves do, but she made a great swipe at it with her father's knife and slashed off its right forepaw” (169).



Thus, Carter’s recasting of fairy tales subverts the patriarchal values lodged in these stories.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.