Skip to main content

The following questions are in reference to chapters 5-9 of Ian Haney López's Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented...

Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class addresses numerous aspects of racial tensions in the United States as they relate to the actions (or inaction) of those in positions of political power, including President Obama.


What are the author’s criticisms of Obama’s policies during his first term?


In Chapter 9, the author focuses on what he terms President Obama's post-racial strategy. He explains his views that Obama "sidestepped" the issue of race with his first-term policies, thus tacitly reinforcing the so-called dog whistle politics being perpetuated by Republican politicians and many Democrats. Haney-López's primary argument is that by not doing enough to address the issues underlying dog whistle politics in his first term, Obama himself became complicit in reinforcing that narrative. Throughout the book, the author takes the view that if someone is in a position of power, he or she has the responsibility not only to refrain from actively participating in dog whistling but to stop it wherever possible as well.


In addition to a lack of active participation in decoding racial appeals made by other politicians, Haney-López also criticizes the President's lack of intervention in racialized mass incarceration during his first term. He view's Obama's post-racial policies as a hindrance to addressing issues such as the mass incarceration of racial minorities. The author also addresses the various ways in which the public and media fed into the post-racial narrative with belief that the election of an African-American President would mean an end to racism. In this sense, the author argues that Obama's first term led to complacency among those who believed that racial tensions in the country would be solved simply through his election and without the need for direct policy changes


The Gates Affair


The Gates Affair refers to the arrest of a well-known African American Harvard professor named Henry Louis Gates, Jr.. Gates was arrested on charges of disorderly conduct at his home after returning from a trip in 2009. After being unable to enter his own home, the police were called by a neighbor who saw Gates trying to enter the house and believed he was breaking in. Gates was questioned and there was an argument between the professor and the arresting officer that led to allegations of misconduct on both sides. The matter drew national media attention when Gates was taken to the police station in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Although the charges against him were later dropped, the matter gained media traction when it became known that Gates and the President were friends. While Obama made a statement to the press regarding the incident, Haney-López criticized him for not directly condemning the police for approaching members of minority groups with what he described in a subsequent article as "an aggressive disrespect and a quick resort to physical domination."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...