Skip to main content

How did politicians of the Gilded Age use the spoils system?

The "Gilded Age" is the period of time during the late 1800s and early 1900s during which a high level of corruption, shoddiness, fakery, and little substance was rampant. The name comes from Mark Twain's novel of the same name.


Perhaps the spoils system is one of the main reasons why this time period became known as the "Gilded Age." In the spoils system, an elected official would unabashedly dole out jobs and favors to friends, family, and others.


These favors manifested themselves in different ways, but it was common to see jobs given in exchange for political favors, and nepotism was obvious in multiple levels of government. One egregious example of the spoils system was evident when U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant oversaw the insertion of several of his wife's family members into federal government positions.


During the tenure of Chester A. Arthur as president, he oversaw the implementation of the Civil Service Commission. This was the beginning of the end for the spoils system, as it set standards that stated that government jobs were to be given by merit, not privilege. Over time, the spoils system slowly gave way to this new process of hiring government employees.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more