Skip to main content

Why do multicellular organisms need a transporting system while single-celled organisms do not?

Multicellular organisms are made up of a large number of cells, while unicellular organisms are made up of one cell each. Unicellular organisms depend on the processes of diffusion and osmosis for exchanging the materials with their immediate environment. However, multicellular organisms are much larger in size and are much more complex, as compared to unicellular organisms. In the case of multicellular organisms, most of the cells are further away from the environment and cannot rely on osmosis and diffusion for direct material exchange with the environment. This means that an elaborate transport system is needed to take the nutrients to the appropriate body part or cell and to take the waste material to the external environment. Thus, we have a heart, blood, veins, arteries, etc. for carrying out the material transport.


The presence of an elaborate and specialized transport system is the reason multicellular organisms can grow to large sizes and have complex organ systems.


Hope this helps.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more