Skip to main content

Who was hurt by Reconstruction in 1865 and why?

It is important to know that Reconstruction was a project that was never completed.


The purpose of Reconstruction, which was started in 1865 and was discontinued after Rutherford B. Hayes signed the Compromise of 1877, was not only to rebuild, or reconstruct, the South, but also to provide black people with political agency and property. The promise of "forty acres and a mule" was made during Reconstruction, but was never fulfilled.


Southern whites' resentment of the federal government and of the North may have intensified during this period. Firstly, there was the matter of black people becoming members of Congress. Secondly, federal troops continued to occupy the South. Thirdly, opportunistic northerners, frequently called "carpetbaggers," went south to profit off of the South's diminished status.


Given the historical record, in my view Southern blacks were hurt most -- not by Reconstruction, but by its unfulfilled promise. Hayes's compromise with Southern legislators resulted in the disfranchisement of black people, and in the creation of a new system of bondage: sharecropping. 


In this system, white planters hired black workers to pick cotton or other crops on their land. For a season of work, the workers would receive shelter, a parcel of land on which they could have their own gardens, and a share of the profits from that season's crops. However, very frequently, planters would cheat workers out of their fair share of profits.


In addition, lynchings became very common soon after Reconstruction, as a means of controlling and terrorizing black populations and diminishing their potential political and economic power.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more