Skip to main content

The grotesque beast and witches are among the memorable figures in "Lord of the Flies" and "Macbeth". What is their thematic significance in the...

The two, in both the novel and the play, thematically represent the destructive forces within man. In Macbeth, the three witches are the personification of evil and in Lord of the Flies, the beast is an imaginary evil creature existing within the boys' consciousness. 


In Macbeth, evil is represented in its physical form by the three witches and their leader, Hecate. The witches' strange appearance and disappearance on the heath when they encounter Macbeth and Banquo, epitomize their supernatural design. They are abnormal creatures and come to represent, to Macbeth, his destiny. He becomes dependent on their predictions and is a willing victim of their manipulation.


The witches tap into Macbeth's innate evil and exploit it to fulfill their pernicious purpose which is to overturn the natural order of things and encourage evil. It is they, as the agents of the lord of all malice, Satan, who motivate the gullible Macbeth and drive him to commit the most pernicious acts: the betrayal and murder of his king and the assassination of his confidante and friend, Banquo, as well as the nefarious annihilation of Macduff's entire family. It is, however, Macbeth's innate evil that truly drives him and once he has awoken his blood lust, it overwhelms and controls him. 


In Lord of the Flies evil is represented in physical form by the dead parachuter which Sam and Eric see and assume is the beast. The 'Lord of the Flies' which is a grotesque and decaying pig's head stuck on a stick, becomes to Simon, the personification of evil with which he has a philosophical discourse during a hallucination. He believes that the pig's head is talking to him and he concludes that evil, the beast, exists within man. Evil and all its elements are innately part of man and cannot be avoided.


Simon, in a hallucinatory state achieves a moment of profound enlightenment and sees that evil is not an external, separate force, but that it is an innate and inseparable part of us. It is, essentially what makes us, paradoxically, both man and beast at the same time. We, therefore, choose to be civilized or not, as Ralph and Jack clearly display. We decide into which force we tap into and what drives us.


Simon also discovers that what Sam and Eric had determined was the beast, was in fact a dead parachuter and, ironically, his attempt at informing the boys about this results in his murder. He wanted to save the boys from their fears but, in the end, he becomes the target of their dread because they believe that he is the beast and brutally kill him. 


It is obvious that evil, as it is represented in both genres, is an innate, dormant force within all men. Once the beast within us is awakened, its path of destruction can go unchecked and can only be stopped or contained by a more powerful force, either internal or external. In Macbeth, that force is represented by Macduff and his allies, whilst in Lord of the Flies, it is epitomized by a naval officer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more