Skip to main content

How do the numbers of electrons compare in two isotopes of an element?

Isotopes are atoms of an element that have the same atomic number, but different atomic masses. For example, U-235 and U-238 are two isotopes of the element uranium. They have the same atomic number (92), but different mass numbers (235 and 238). The atomic number is the same as the number of protons. 


Thus, the number of protons of uranium = atomic number of uranium = 92.


The mass number is the sum total of number of protons and neutrons.


Thus, number of neutron = mass number - number of protons


= 235 - 92 = 143


and, 238 - 92 = 146.


Thus, the isotopes have same number of protons, but different numbers of neutrons.


Since the number of electrons is equal to the number of protons for an atom in the ground state, the number of electrons will be equal for all the isotopes of an element (for example, for the two isotopes of uranium, the number of electrons is 92).


Thus, the isotopes of an element differ only in terms of the number of neutrons and not in terms of the number of protons or electrons. 


Hope this helps.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more