Skip to main content

Why has the narrator returned to her childhood home in "The Leap"?

The narrator of Louise Erdrich's "The Leap" returns to her childhood home in order take care of her mother, who has lost her eyesight.


Certainly, the daughter feels that she is obligated to care for her mother. For, she states that she owes her life to her mother three times.


  1. If her mother had not saved her own life when the circus tent lightning struck it, the daughter would not have been born.

  2. If her mother had not gone to the hospital where her father cared for her as the doctor, she would not have been born.

  3. If her mother had not rescued her as only she could, the daughter would have died in the house fire.

The narrator has a marvelous mother who heroically saves her daughter's life when the farmhouse catches fire. In fact, only she can effect this rescue because the steps to the bedroom are consumed by fire. So, the mother must climb a tree, go out onto a branch and jump upon the roof, then hang upside down and ask her daughter to open her bedroom window so that she can jump inside. Then, she cradles her beloved child in her arms and together, she and her daughter jump safely into the fireman's net. 


This is the "leap." It is a leap that carries significance to anyone who sees it, but especially for the daughter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.