Skip to main content

Why do some writers choose poetry over fiction or autobiography when writing about their experiences? What can poetry offer an artist that other...

One of the best advantages of poetry over any kind of prose is its conciseness. Because all the excess words have been squeezed out, the message left on the page is so much more concentrated.  Any imagery or emotional effect that the author wants readers to respond to is right there, standing out in a very visual format, not buried in a chapter somewhere.  Also, by its very nature poetry is designed to draw emotional responses out of us.  We expect the author to give us vivid imagery, to put us through emotional experiences that we either relate to in our own way, or experience vicariously through the author’s words.


Because Siegfried Sassoon was writing about his very graphic, emotional, and often controversial experiences in and beliefs about World War I, perhaps he felt that the world would accept his autobiographical account of it in poetry form better.  Such a deeply passionate experience as fighting in and surviving a world war seems fit for the poetry genre by its very nature. For example, in Counter Attack, he describes how the living, with gangrene legs, step over the rotting bodies of the dead.  They are "face downward, in the sucking mud, / And naked sodden buttocks, mats of hair, /  Bulged, clotted heads slept in the plastering slime." Readers know this is a true account of Siegfried Sassoon's experiences.  This vivid description provokes a strong emotional response in readers.


Also consider that politically, Sassoon wanted to gain an audience to listen to him, and although he did eventually write three autobiographical novels, his first instinct while recovering from his war injuries was to employ his best writing skill--poetry.  Early on, many of his British contemporaries shied away from what they felt was his unpatriotic view of the war.  Sassoon may have felt that he would not have drawn a large audience with an entire book of his shockingly graphic accounts of trench life, of the horror and pain, especially given his often satiric voice about war.  But a poem? It is shorter, more accessible.  He likely did pick up more readers through that medium.  He could use all the figurative language techniques to present the brutality of what he and other soldiers experienced.  He could use symbolism and imagery to create compassion in his readers, to help them feel as though they were there, watching their friends die with him.  In this manner, Sassoon hoped his poems would cause others to question their political and military leaders’ motives in war.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...