Skip to main content

What are your feelings about "human engineering"-that is, changing person intelligence or personality by using science? Explain your opinion,...

After reading Flowers for Algernon, I see the terrible  human impact of “personality engineering.” I see that Charlie suffered incredible emotional trauma after being manipulated by personality engineering. I see that he felt a lack of control over his own life due to the shifting effects of the experiment and came to rebel against the very scientists who thought they were his saviors. His escape from Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur illustrates this. I also infer that personality engineering is harmful not only to its subject, but to the subject’s family, friends, and loved ones. These people may be shocked and hurt by changes in the person they loved. Alice Kinnian’s character arc illustrates this. She originally supported Charlie’s operation but quickly became overwhelmed and confused by her friend’s new personality. Since Keyes so readily persuades me to sympathize with his main character, after only reading Flowers for Algernon, I might have a dim view of personality engineering.


However, as you answer this question, it’s important to separate science fiction from fact. We are likely hundreds, if not thousands, of years away from a scientific breakthrough that would mimic the exponential intellectual growth that redefined Charlie’s personality. There are government regulations, as well as self-imposed moral rules, that make it impossible for scientists to tinker with a person’s personality in the same way as Dr. Strauss and Dr. Neumor manipulate Charlie’s thoughts and behaviors. To delve deeper into this question, I would urge you to think of less extreme real-life examples that could be classified as “human engineering.” For example, a large percentage of the population takes medication to alleviate medical problems such as ADHD, bipolar disorder, PTSD, and many other ailments. I would tentatively classify these as “human engineering” through science. These medications change how people feel inside and present themselves to the world. Many people are incredibly grateful that these medications exist and would suffer intensely without them. In these situations, many commentators may argue that modifying a person’s personality through science is a moral action that decreases pain and improves an individual's quality of life. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.