Skip to main content

Compare Charlie before the surgery to the new Charlie-- which is happier?

Before his surgery, Charlie Gordon was very happy with his life. He had a job and thought of his coworkers as his friends. He also attended evening classes and appreciated the kindness and interest of his teacher, Miss Kinnian. He hoped that if anything, the surgery would make him more intelligent so that he would be better in conversation and make more friends.


After his surgery, Charlie is initially disappointed that the effects of the operation are not immediate. However, he continues to work and attend classes and finds himself rapidly growing more competent. Though he is pleased that he is able to beat Algernon in some challenges, he has also become far more aware and self-reflective. He begins to realize that his "friends" at work have been making fun of him, and remembers the difficult childhood he had growing up. He is even fired from his job when he tries to point out that a coworker has been stealing. He struggles to socialize and soon begins to experience the decline that eventually killed Algernon.


Are you familiar with the expression, "Ignorance is bliss?" I think this holds true for Charlie. He was much happier before his surgery because he was not capable of the kind of awareness and reflection that caused him stress afterwards. He was happy and very lucky to be ignorant of the bad things in his life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more