Skip to main content

How would you describe Biff and Happy from Death of a Salesman? Who is more sympathetic?

In Death of a Salesman, Willy's elder son Biff is uncertain, insecure, and haunted by struggles with his father's expectations. As a child, Biff's parents believed he had more potential than his brother, but once he reached adulthood Biff struggled to hold down a stable job. He dreams of working as a farmer and feels his father and the expectations of his family only serve as obstacles to his desires. Once he discovers his father's affair, Biff loses faith and respect for him and begins to question his values and dreams.


Happy is Willy's younger son who has managed to hold down a modest job as an assistant after a lifetime of living in his brother's shadow. He is interested in career advancement and gaining his parents' approval. He always defends his family members, but his womanizing lifestyle disappoints his mother.


In the play, Biff is written more sympathetically than Happy. Happy shares his father's habit of deluding himself into ignoring how miserable he feels; he lacks insight into his feelings. Biff, on the other hand, is a character with complex feelings who develops throughout the story. Happy is more of a static character, but Biff has complicated feelings about his life, career, and father that develop throughout the course of the play.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.