Skip to main content

What is a quote from Moneyball that describes Billy Beane as a smart or great general manager?

One quote that describes Oakland Athletics' Billy Beane as a smart general manager relates to his resourcefulness.


Moneyball highlights baseball's financial landscape. Teams that play in large media and consumer markets like the Boston Red Sox or the New York Yankees are part of baseball's upper class because of their financial position. At the same time, small-market teams like the Oakland Athletics are at a competitive disadvantage because they lack financial resources. In order for Oakland's general manager Billy Beane to put forth a quality team, he had to be resourceful. He had to harvest data and look for value where he could find it.


This was not the only part of his daunting task to make Oakland a competitive baseball team. Beane also had to communicate his vision to athletes and executives who were operating under outdated paradigms. This required a specific skill set that makes him a great general manager:  



It was hard to know which of Billy's qualities was most important to his team's success: his energy, his resourcefulness, his intelligence, or his ability to scare the living s**t out of even very large professional baseball players.



In Moneyball, Billy Beane's greatness as a general manager is not only his ability to judge talent through sabermetric analysis. He is resourceful in the way he conveys this methodology and approach to athletes and baseball scouts who are mired in a philosophy that was not going to work under Oakland's financial reality. Sometimes, he has to lead by example. Other times, he has to use direct force and intimidation to make his point.


Beane's resourcefulness comes from being a former athlete and now seeing reality as an executive. Straddling both worlds enhances his resourcefulness. This unique skill set is a significant reason why he is seen as a great general manager.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.