Skip to main content

What are examples of structural grammar sentence analysis?

Examples of structural grammar applied to sentence analysis will show the syntax relationships between speech units that constitute the structure of each sentence. The smallest speech units that determine syntax relationships in language are phonemes and morphemes and words. Sentence element word classes and syntax relationships are designated by standard symbols used for structural grammar analysis. The two examples that follow the symbols (below) have limited detail since diagrams aren't supported by this format:


(Sb) is the symbol for sentence Subject. (P) is for sentence Predicate. (H) is for Head. (M) is for Modifier. (V) is for Verb. (C) is for Complement. (Sub) is for subordinate component. (D) is for Dependent component. These are additional standard symbols, Det: determiner; pres: present tense; Adj: adjective; Prn: pronoun; Aux: auxiliary verb.


Examples
The can has a broken tab.  
The can (Sb) has a broken tab. (P)
The (M) can (H) has (V) a broken tab. (D)
... a broken (M) tab. (H)
The (Det) can (Noun) has (Verb, pres) a (Det) broken (Adj) tab (Noun).

I will tag the black horse.
I (Sb) will tag the black horse. (P)
I (H) will tag (V) the black horse. (D)
... the black (M) horse. (H)
I (Prn) will (Aux) tag (Verb, pres) the (Det) black (Adj) horse (Noun).


In structural grammar, phonemes are the smallest speech unit of language that determine word meaning: bit is a different thing from mit and kit because of the phonemes /b/ and /m/ and /k/, although all these words are in the noun word class. The verbs tap and tag can be changed to the noun word class tab (e.g., soda can tab) and tack by the substitution of the phonemes /b/ and /ck/, substituting for the phonemes /p/ or /g/. This change in word class results in a change in syntax relationships.


Morphemes are the smallest grammatical speech unit of language that determine meaning, word class and syntax relationship. For example, the morpheme free, of the adjective word class, can be changed to the noun word class by the addition of the morpheme -dom, a noun forming morpheme, forming the noun freedom.


Syntax relationships between speech words carry the meaning communicated by language. Structural grammar does not, however, consider semantic meaning a function of grammar. The word class and the syntax relationships between words can be changed by the addition, removal or substitution of phonemes and morphemes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more