Skip to main content

Who was Montmorency in Jerome's Three Men in a Boat? What did the narrator think about him initially? When did he change his opinion of the dog?

Montmorency is the dog in the title of the book. He’s a fox terrier. The narrator describes his appearance and reputation – in his usual exaggerating style -- in Chapter II. Here he says that when Montmorency first moved in with him, he thought the animal was angelic and could do no wrong. His opinion changed when he learned that the dog had killed a dozen chickens and a cat, and that their owners demanded restitution for the losses. He had to drag him, “growling and kicking, by the scruff of his neck, out of a hundred and fourteen street fights.” We get the impression that in spite of his small size and adorable looks, Montmorency is a vicious street dog who is always looking for trouble. As with everything else the narrator writes, we’re not sure whether or not we should believe him. We learn more about the dog in Chapters XIII and XIV, when he has an encounter with an even tougher cat; when he offers a water rat for George’s Irish stew; and when he “argues” with the tea kettle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.