Skip to main content

Explain why the gem-dimethyl groups appear as separate peaks in the proton NMR spectrum of isoborneol although they almost overlap in borneol.

We are talking about the difference between the structures of borneol and isoborneol (see the structures of both compounds in the link referenced below).  Both are bicyclic molecules with the norbornane structure at their cores.  The gem dimethyl group in question is the carbon at the top of the structures with two methyl (CH3) groups attached to it.  The only difference between the two molecules is the spatial orientation of the hydroxyl (OH) group.  In borneol, the hydroxyl group is pointed down and away from the gem dimethyl group.  In isoborneol, the hydroxyl group is pointed up and toward the gem dimethyl group.  Since NMR distinguishes between chemically unique hydrogen atoms, the hydroxyl group in isoborneol affects the methyl group that is pointed toward it but not the methyl group pointed away from it, thus the two methyl groups appear as two different peaks in the NMR spectrum.  In the case of borneol, the hydroxyl group is pointed in the opposite direction and therefore exerts essentially no effect on the gem dimethyl group, thus it appears as a single peak in the NMR spectrum.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.