Skip to main content

What is one way that the Confederate States of America was similar to the United States? What is one way it was different?

There were similarities and differences between the Confederate States of America and the United States of America. One similarity was with the structure of the government. Both governments had three branches of government. The legislative branch made the laws. The executive branch carried out the laws. The judicial branch interpreted the laws.


One difference between the Confederate States of America and the United States of America was that the President of the Confederacy could only serve one term as President. The length of that term was six years. The President of the United States served a four-year term. There were no limits, at the time, on the number of terms the President of the United States could serve.


Another major difference is that the Confederacy allowed slavery to exist. It was written into their constitution. The U.S. constitution didn't outlaw slavery, but didn't endorse it either. After the Civil War, the U.S. officially banned slavery with the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.