Skip to main content

Just because a government has a constitution, does that mean that the constitution has to be followed?

The answer to this is “absolutely not.”  A constitution is just a piece of paper.  It can only be enforced on the government if the people are willing to do so.  This means the government does not have to obey the constitution unless the people force it to do so.


A constitution sets the rules that a government is supposed to follow.  However, a government cannot be coerced by outside forces.  Only the government has the legitimate right to engage in violence in a given society.  There is no force higher than the government that can physically compel it to act in a certain way.  This means that there is no entity that can force the government to obey its constitution. 


As an example of this, we can say that there was a long time when the US government did not obey some parts of its constitution.  The Constitution of the US (specifically, the 14th Amendment) says that all Americans have to enjoy the equal protection of the law.  However, African Americans and other people of color were not treated equally by the government for decades after the 14th Amendment was ratified.  There was no entity that could force the US government to obey the 14th Amendment.


Constitutions are only relevant if the people force the government to obey them.  In the 1950s and 1960s, public protests showed the American government that the people wanted it to honor the 14th Amendment.  At that point, it started to do so.  It was only pressure from the public that could force the government to obey. 


Constitutions are not strong walls against government misbehavior.  The government can violate the constitution if the people allow it to.  Governments only have to obey their constitutions if their people force them to do so.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more