At the beginning of the novella, George yells at Lennie for carrying a dead mouse in his pocket. When George asks Lennie why he wants to carry around a dead mouse, Lennie tells him that he simply enjoys petting it with his thumb. After George throws the mouse into the brush, Lennie retrieves it and attempts to hide it from George. When George realizes that Lennie has the dead mouse, George throws the mouse away again despite Lennie begging him to keep it. Lennie's insistence on petting the dead mouse illustrates his affinity for touching soft things. The fact that he fears and listens to George demonstrates his reliance and obedience to him. The reader also learns that Lennie cannot overcome his instincts to pet the mouse, which foreshadows his inability to control his emotions when Curley's wife allows Lennie to stroke her hair.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment