Skip to main content

How do chromatophores work?

Chromatophores are a type of cell (or group of cells) which are capable of reflecting light and which contain pigments.


The functioning of these cells vary from one organism to another. For example, cephalopods use multicellular "organs" to generate their quick color changes. Chromatophore units in these creatures consist of a chromatophore cell which holds a cytoelastic sacculus (a tiny sac of pigment granules) and many muscle, glial, nerve, and sheath cells. These tiny sacs of color are stretched when muscles controlled by the nervous system pull on them, expanding the sacs so that the color they contain can be seen. The color disappears when the muscles relax and the sacs shrink back to their normal size. 


In reptiles, amphibians, and fish, on the other hand, color shifts arise not out of a change in the shape of the color sac, but rather via the movement of pigment within the cell. 


The benefit of this kind of physiological color change lies in the ability to adapt to one's background; the camouflage provided by these cells helps organisms hide from perceived threats, as well as reflect different environmental and internal factors like mood, stress level, and temperature. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more