Skip to main content

Because sputnik travels at 18,000 mph, it can make an orbit of Earth once every _______ min.

We can make some simple calculations to solve this problem and get an approximate answer. The average diameter of Earth is 12,756 km or 7927 miles. The satellite used to fly about 500 miles above the surface of Earth. Thus, the distance traveled in completing one orbit can be approximated as the circumference of the circle whose radius is the distance of Sputnik from center of Earth. This distance is equal to the sum of Earth's radius and the distance of the satellite over the Earth's surface. We can also use the diameter of this orbit for the calculations. 


Thus, distance traveled = `pi` D = `pi` (7927 + 2 x 500) miles = 28,045 miles


Since the speed of the satellite is about 18,000 miles per hour, time taken to complete one orbit is:


time = distance / speed = 28045 miles / 18000 mph = 1.558 h = 93.5 min.


Thus, using the above approximations, it would take about 93.5 min for Sputnik to complete 1 orbit of Earth.


In reality, the actual time taken was about 96.2 minutes. The discrepancy between our result and the actual data is because we have made simplifying assumptions. For example, the orbit was not circular and the satellite did not maintain a constant distance from Earth. The satellite had an apogee of about 583.5 miles and a perigee of 133.6 miles.


Hope this helps. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more