Skip to main content

What are some race-related events that are foreshadowed throughout Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird and really remind the reader the underbelly...

One race-related event in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird is the outcome of Tom Robinson's trial. Robinson's innocence in the crime he's being accused of is made evident the moment during the trial we learn that Mayella Ewell had been bruised on the right side of her face, which could only have been accomplished by a left-handed man facing her, whereas Robinson has been crippled in his left arm and hand since he was a boy and got his arm caught in a cotton gin. What also convinces the reader of Robinson's innocence is the fact that Atticus proves to the court that Bob Ewell is ambidextrous. Since Robinson is innocent, it is clear he has been brought to trial and declared guilty by the jury simply because of the color of his skin.

Robinson's guilty verdict, despite his innocence, is foreshadowed in the book's title and the scene in which the meaning of the title is explained to the reader. In Chapter 9, Scout and Jem are given air rifles for Christmas. In Chapter 10, Atticus expresses his wish that Scout and Jem would only shoot "tin cans in the back yard" but, knowing they'll shoot birds, gives the the following warning:



Shoot all the bluejays you want, if you can hit 'em, but remember it's a sin to kill a mockingbird (Chapter 10).



When asked, Miss Maudie explains to Scout that Atticus is correct in saying the above because mockingbirds don't cause mischief like other birds; all they do is "sing their hearts out" all day long (Chapter 10). Therefore, the mockingbird symbolizes all innocent beings in the story, such as Robinson, and Atticus's warning not to kill them foreshadows Robinson's defeat in his trial despite his innocence, a defeat incited by racial hatred.

In this same chapter, the death of the rabid dog named Tim Johnson foreshadows Robinson's death after his trial, a second race-related event. Though Robinson would be on death row for quite a while and Atticus had hoped to overturn his sentence—possibly even his conviction, upon appeal—Robinson gave up all hope of being served justice by white men and, immediately after his trial, decided to try to take justice into his own hands by attempting to escape prison. He was shot to death while trying to escape and shot far more times than really necessary, which shows he was shot and killed out of racial hatred, not out of the guards' necessity. Just as Robinson was shot to death as an innocent man, Tim Johnson was shot to death as a helpless, innocent dog. Dogs certainly don't become infected with rabies intentionally, nor do they mean to cause the harm and death they can cause once infected; therefore, Tim Johnson, though rabid, also symbolizes an innocent being, a being society thinks must be killed because the being has become violated by something evil, something like racism. The death of Tim Johnson foreshadows Robinson's upcoming death. We especially see what Tim Johnson's death foreshadows when Scout remembers his death just after the lynch mob scene. In bed that night, Scout reflects in her narration:



I was very tired, and was drifting into sleep when the memory of Atticus calmly folding his newspaper and pushing back his hat became Atticus standing in the middle of an empty waiting street, pushing up his glasses. The full meaning of the night's events hit me and I began crying (Chapter 16).



Standing, waiting, and pushing up his glasses in the middle of a street is exactly what Atticus did while waiting with Sheriff Tate for Tim Johnson to come within shooting distance. If Scout associates shooting Tim Johnson with Atticus guarding Robinson from a lynch mob, then we know Scout has realized the death of an innocent being is about to take place a second time, and Atticus is doing his best to prevent it, despite its inevitability, just as he at first refused to shoot Tim Johnson.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more