Skip to main content

Describe one piece of pop culture that can be considered literature and one that is not literature.

Literature is a term we use for written works like books, magazines, and sometimes even pamphlets or leaflets. Many pieces of literature become famous enough to be considered "popular culture," like the works of William Shakespeare or J. K. Rowling. Not all pop culture is necessarily literary, but let's bear in mind that the literary pop culture of today does help to shape the non-literary pop culture of tomorrow through the greater workings of culture and memetics.


As an example of literary pop culture, we can discuss the young-adult fiction series, The Hunger Games. This book series was a hit among youths and adults alike, as protagonist Katniss Everdeen is very relatable, and the conflict of the story mirrors real events and possibilities throughout our own world. Though the books have also been made into a film series, the pop culture content comes from the books themselves. 


Perhaps a better example of literary pop culture would be Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. This play was written more than four-hundred years ago, but is still quoted on a daily basis around the world! Shakespeare's work is very famous and permeates the pop culture of not just the English speaking world, but almost every language and culture on the planet. 


As I mentioned above, pop culture isn't always literary, but can be inspired by literature. For example, Taylor Swift's song, "Love Story," references the characters Romeo and Juliet. Though this song draws on earlier literary pop culture, the lyrics and music themselves technically are not literature. 


Another example of pop culture that is not literary would be Andy Warhol's famous titled Campbell's Soup CansWarhol was one of the pioneers of "pop art-" art that drew from pop culture symbols like the already famous soup brand, Campbell's. Warhol's interpretation of the image of the soup cans has become very popular in Western Modern Art. These works were both shaped by popular culture and helped to shape the future of pop culture! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.