Skip to main content

What is one important similarity between the British colonies in the Chesapeake region and the British colonies in New England in the period from...

The New England and Chesapeake colonies had many differences.  They did, however, share some similarities.  


Both were settled by British citizens who adhered to a Christian faith.  The Pilgrims were Separatists, and they settled in Massachusetts.  Puritans later settled in New England.  The Chesapeake colonists were mostly members of the Church of England.


Colonists in both regions built towns filled with houses, stores, and institutions.  Cities such as Boston and Williamsburg were built.  Commerce was important in both regions, and goods were shipped from England to sell in colonial shops.  Colonists from both New England and the Chesapeake region established towns and cities near bays and the Atlantic Ocean.  This allowed cities and towns to be easily accessible by ship.


Colonists from both regions farmed to maintain food supplies.  Farming was more prevalent in the Chesapeake region due to the fertile soil and longer growing season.  New England colonists farmed, but their long winters and rocky soil sometimes made growing crops difficult.


Disease was a hardship that colonists from both regions faced.  Diseases often spread through towns and cities.  Disease killed many early settlers in both Jamestown and Plymouth Colony.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.