Skip to main content

How are George and Hazel alike in "Harrison Bergeron"?

Hazel and George Bergeron are only alike because of the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments. "The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal."


In the society of the year 2081, agents of the Handicapper General are vigilant in the enforcement of equality. With this forced equality, in which the highly intelligent such as George Bergeron must be burdened with "handicaps," such as a forty-seven pound bag of birdshot around his neck and sirens that go off in his head that impede intelligent and significant thought, those who are the paragons of mediocrity, such as Diana Moon Glampers, who need not wear any handicap, can move into positions of authority and feel the equal of anyone else. Similarly, the average Hazel Bergeron, whose genetic make-up is her handicap, finds herself the equal of her husband George without wearing any handicaps at all.


Kurt Vonnegut's story of handicaps upon the strong, athletic, and intelligent illustrates how damaging and ineffectual attempts to make everyone equal can be. For, the weaker can not be made stronger without weakening those who are strong. There is no true "equality" in life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more