Skip to main content

What are some American presidents that can compare to the situations presented in Orwell's Animal Farm?

I think that there could be some comparisons between the way Napoleon and President Nixon viewed power.


Napoleon was far worse a leader than President Nixon. Napoleon ordered executions, tortured members of the body politic, and consolidated his power without any semblance of checks and balances.  Nixon resigned from office because of impending impeachment from the United States Congress.  However, there are similarities between how both men viewed their power.


In many respects, both men viewed political opponents as enemies. For example, Napoleon viewed Snowball as a threat that needed to be neutralized.  When both pigs put forth their ideas for the future of the farm to the other animals, Napoleon does not wait for public opinion to validate which vision is better.  He uses his dogs to chase Snowball away from the farm.  In a similar way, Nixon had an "enemies list."  Along with his staff, Nixon made note of people who showed opposition to his policies and incumbency.  He did not hesitate to refer to them as "enemies."  In conversations with his staff, Nixon insisted on "comprehensive notes" of people that "tried to do us [Nixon's administration] in."  Nixon and Napoleon demonstrated extreme antipathy to people who disagreed with their leadership.


Both leaders also used the government to consolidate their power. Napoleon used his dogs as a private security force.  They followed his orders to protect him.  They also obeyed when he ordered them to kill those who challenged him.  Orwell shows how Napoleon displays his brutality in the way he dispatches his doges to kill the animals who "confess" their disloyalty to Napoleon.  Nixon used the American government in much the same way, according to then-White House counsel John Dean:



This memorandum [detailing the enemies list] addresses the matter of how we can maximize the fact of our incumbency in dealing with persons known to be active in their opposition to our Administration; stated a bit more bluntly—how we can use the available federal machinery to screw our political enemies.



The use of the "federal machinery" included audits from the Internal Revenue Service and handling issues such as contracts or granting federal grants. Nixon did not hesitate to tell members of his staff to use "the Bureau [Federal Bureau of Investigation" and the "Justice Department" against those who stood opposed to his administration.  Napoleon and Nixon did not view power as shared and collaborative.  They viewed it in adversarial terms where anyone deemed as a threat had to be counteracted.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.