Skip to main content

Explain the factors involved in the spread of Christianity in the Roman Empire both before and after the conversion of Constantine.

Before Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in 313 CE, making Christianity an accepted religion in the Roman Empire, the religion spread in part because its message of salvation appealed greatly to people who lived disenfranchised lives, particularly on the borders of the Roman Empire. Women, children, and slaves were particularly drawn to Christianity, as it promised equality that was not present in the social hierarchy of the Roman Empire. For example, women could serve as deaconesses in the early Christian church.


In addition, apostles such as Paul journeyed across the Roman Empire, preaching to poor people in cities such as Ephesus and Athens, where the poor were particularly receptive to his message. Paul hastened the spread of Christianity by preaching not only to Jews, but also to non-Jews, broadening the base of potential converts. In addition, Christianity relaxed many of the Jewish laws regarding diet and other religious practices, making it more appealing to converts. Upheavals during the third century CE continued to enhance Christianity's appeal, as Rome was rocked by invasions and political problems.


After Constantine converted to Christianity and made Christianity legal, he constructed churches and promoted Christians to high offices. He was a patron of the religion and used the power of the state to spread Christianity. He also provided incentives, such as tax breaks, to members of the Christian clergy. Though Christians still faced persecution after Constantine, Christianity eventually became the religion of the Roman Empire. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.