Skip to main content

I'm reading "The House of Asterion" by Jorge Luis Borges and I have a question about the effect and significance of the point of view in the story.

It's safe to say that Borges was obsessed with literal and metaphorical labyrinths. The story begins in the first person point of view. The narrator calls himself Asterion and with the introductory line, it seems to indicate that he is a prince who is not allowed to leave his castle. The narrator goes on to defend himself. He claims that he is not a prisoner even though he never leaves his house. He says that claims about his madness and misanthropy (hating mankind) are just the result of the public's contempt for him.


The footnote adds that fourteen actually means infinite and therefore, there are an infinite number of doors. This is according to Asterion. He, Asterion, also says, "The house is the same size as the world; or rather it is the world." Having never left his house, it would be "the world" to him. We get this unique perspective from the narrator, a being who lives a hermetic life in a seemingly endless labyrinth of a home. Is his perspective based upon psychosis as an effect of being a prisoner or is he actually living in a gigantic labyrinth from which he can not escape? 


This story is reminiscent of Edgar Allan Poe's writing. We don't know if the narrator is misunderstood. It isn't until the final line that we get a clue about who the narrator is or why he lives this way. In the last few lines, the narration shifts from the first person perspective of Asterion to the first person perspective of Theseus. From this line, we learn that Theseus has just destroyed the Minotaur. And from this, we can conclude that the first bulk of the story is narrated by the Minotaur. Theseus is the "redeemer" the Minotaur spoke about. Killing the Minotaur was redeeming him or freeing him from his labyrinthine prison. 


Borges chooses to consider the Minotaur's perspective so the reader can get the sense of his experience. Borges is playing with ideas like the labyrinth, infinity, and perspective. The Minotaur says his house is the world because that is all he's ever known. This is, perhaps, an allusion to Plato's Allegory of the Cave. In this allegory, people are in a cave and they are chained in such a way that they have no knowledge of the outside world. Borges was always interested in how people see the world differently. He was also interested in how perspective is limited or filtered. He uses the Minotaur's perspective to explore these ideas. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.