Skip to main content

Revolutions fail because leaders pursue their own interest as oppose to the interest of those whom the revolution was meant to serve. Critically...

By the end of the book, the revolution that established Animal Farm has taken exactly this course. The pigs, who emerged as leaders of the uprising and in implementing Animalism on the farm, quickly become corrupted with their newfound power. Even before Snowball is purged from the farm, the pigs are allowing themselves extra privileges, like milk and apples in their mash. Over time, Napoleon continues to abuse the considerable power he has amassed. He trains fierce attack dogs that are used to kill those whom he views as disloyal. He and the other pigs begin to drink alcohol, sleep in the farmhouse, and even wear human clothes. They engage in shady deals with humans outside the farm, some of which go very badly. Squealer justifies their behavior to the other animals, and the pigs gradually alter the Seven Commandments to read that some animals are more equal than others. In the end, the animals are more miserable than they were under Jones, even loyal Boxer has been sent to the knacker (just as Old Major, ironically, said he would be by Jones) and the pigs live in luxury in the farmhouse, gambling, drinking, and consorting with humans. By the end of the book, the revolution has thus failed to achieve the aims that Old Major laid out in the first chapter. The pigs are indistinguishable from the humans, who they have matched in their greed and cruelty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.