Skip to main content

What is the structure of Oedipus the king?

The play begins with a bit of exposition and the incentive moment: Thebes is beset by plagues, and Oedipus vows to find out the cause and to do something about it.  Almost everything that follows is a carefully ordered chain of cause and effect (except for the arrival of the messenger from Corinth): this is the rising action.  The plagues have already caused Oedipus to send his brother-in-law, Creon, to the oracle for guidance.  When Creon returns, he reports that they must find the murderer of Laius, the former king of Thebes, and Oedipus's father (though he doesn't realize this yet).  This causes Oedipus to put a curse on Laius's murderer and to call the blind prophet, Teiresias, for advice. 


When he arrives, Teiresias accuses Oedipus of being the murderer, and this angers Oedipus greatly, causing him to suspect a conspiracy between Teiresias and Creon, who he assumes must have committed the murder himself.  Oedipus and Creon argue.  When Jocasta tells the story of Laius's murder, her mention of the specific location at which he was killed makes Oedipus suspicious that he might have been the killer after all, so they send for the herdsman, who tells his story.  Then the messenger from Corinth arrives to tell of the death of the man Oedipus believes to be his father, Polybus.  When the herdsman's and the messenger's stories are combined, the truth comes to light: that Oedipus is the son of Laius and Jocasta, not Polybus and Merope -- this is the climax (or the moment of the most tension in the story). 


After the climax comes the falling action: Jocasta's off-stage suicide is reported, as is Oedipus's self-blinding with the brooches from her robes.  Oedipus briefly speaks with his daughters, lamenting their fates as a result of his own.  Finally, in the resolution, Oedipus is exiled, per his request (and his own initial curse).  This ends the plague.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.