Skip to main content

What is a definition of history?

Napoleon Bonaparte defined history as "a fable retold." Interestingly, the word for both history and story in his language (French) are the same word: histoire. Another wording of this definition is that history is the record of events that suits the powers in control. 


Bonaparte's and the other definition notwithstanding, part of history is usually objective and accurate; that is, the record of significant events from the past. Here is one definition that is certainly workable:



History is a narration of the events which have happened among mankind, including an account of the rise and fall of nations, as well as of other great changes which have affected the political and social condition of the human race.



That history changes according to who is in power, or what ideology is prevalent does have some substantiation as educators can attest. For, those who have been teaching History courses for some decades know how textbooks from even as little as a decade ago demonstrate that there are now some different interpretations of events. Or, for instance, if a war's history is examined in an American textbook, and then in a textbook from another country that was involved in the same war, there are usually some differing interpretations on certain events. (There are teachers in the U.S. who have had foreign exchange students and will attest to this. When they read about their own country's involvement in wars and such in American textbooks, these students often argue that the history is recorded incorrectly.)


Literature, too, is history as it is the recording of man's thoughts and emotions and struggles--the history of cultures.


A simple definition from a dictionary is that history is 



a chronological record of significant events (as affecting a nation or institution) often including an explanation of their causes.



Perhaps the difficulty lies in finding the "explanation." 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.