Skip to main content

A hypothetical scenario: Lets assume that Tybalt didn't attack Romeo, Mercucio didn't die, Romeo didn't kill Tybalt and as a result he wasn't...

With the conditions mentioned above, there could be a resolving of the conflict between the two families provided the Lords Capulet and Montague were agreeable to the union of Romeo and Juliet.


While Lord Capulet does not seem to be the initiator of conflict, he is not one to shy from it. In Act I, for instance, Capulet angrily calls for his sword as Montague "flourishes his blade" (1.1.68). For this reason, it would seem, then, that the initiator of amelioration should be Lord Montague, yet Montague is angered when he sees Capulet and is ready to fight; furthermore, he is held back only by Lady Montague.


Lord and Lady Montague love their son dearly, for they are deeply concerned about his melancholy state. Similarly, the Capulets love their daughter as evinced in the protective Lord Capulet's reluctance to speak to Count Paris of his daughter's marrying him:



My child is yet a stranger in the world--
She hath not seen the change of fourteen years.
Let two more summers wither in their pride
Ere we may think her ripe to be a bride. (1.2.8-10)



In fact, it is this protectiveness which acts as a deterrent to the possibility of young Juliet's marrying Romeo more, perhaps, than the feud. For, when Lord Capulet does decide that Juliet should marry, the marriage is determined by him. He informs Juliet that she will marry Count Paris. But, when Juliet demurs, Lord Capulet becomes angry, just as he does when Tybalt wants to kill Romeo.
With Lord Capulet as a rather domineering patriarch, it seems doubtful that he would approve of Juliet's marriage to Romeo, despite his appreciation of the young man's character. Nor is he influenced by his wife, who is merely submissive to his orders; for, she will not listen to Juliet even as her daughter threatens to kill herself if she is made to marry Paris.


In addition, while Lord Capulet does recognize the sterling qualities of Romeo at the celebration for Juliet, he forbids Tybalt from doing anything because he does not wish to upset his guests. Therefore, it seems that he wishes to be the one who controls events. When Lord Capulet is not in control, conflict seems to follow.


___________________


Much less is known about Lord Montague than there is about Lord Capulet since he appears only in the beginning of the play and in the final scene. In both instances, Lord Montague demonstrates his love for his son. In Act I, for instance, he is concerned that Romeo has not shown himself and appears gloomy over a woman. Lady Montague asks Benvolio if he has seen anyone because they are worried about their son.
Lord Montague complains that Romeo keeps too much to himself. So, he would clearly prefer to interact with his son and might be open to Romeo's marriage to Juliet if he felt that Romeo truly loves the girl. However, this is mere conjecture as Montague does harbor hatred for the Capulets. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.