Skip to main content

How have the literary backgrounds of England and America affected their contemporary writing?

Although most people alive today think of the United States as a major world power, historically, both the United States and Canada were colonized by Europeans. Thus, when we think of contemporary literatures in England and the United States, we are considering cultures that were shaped by different experiences, despite their sharing a common language. 


English literature is essentially colonial and European, reflecting a long continuous history as an imperial power. England, however, is no longer the great imperial power it was in the nineteenth century and much English literary reflection is devoted to the question of whether England should in response to this emphasize her own Englishness, retreating from internationalism, as advocated by Philip Larkin, or whether it should it embrace international postmodernism, either of a European or American flavor.


The literature of the United States, on the other hand, reflects a postcolonial experience. First, it attempted to imitate the European models to avoid being considered a provincial backwater, but slowly began to assert cultural as well as political independence by either embracing regionalism (as is the case with Southern Gothic, prairie, and other regional movements) or arguing for new cultural forms to suit a new continent, as one can see in traditions stemming from Whitman and progressing through the Beats to many forms of contemporary writing. Also, American contemporary literature has begun to embrace cultural diversity, honoring the unique contributions of Native Americans, African Americans, Latino/Latina writers, and Asian Americans. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.