Skip to main content

How is the plot advanced when Nagaina started targeting the human family?

The part when Nag and Nagaina decide to target the human family in the house furthers the plot as part of the rising action. A few hours before, Rikki-tikki proves his quickness against the cobras when he dodges their come-from-behind sneak attack. Rikki-tikki then proves his lethality when he kills Karait. At that point in the story, the cobras know that Rikki-tikki is dangerous, and he knows that they are dangerous. An uneasy truce could have been established; however, Nag and Nagaina decide to escalate the tension. The snakes believe that if the humans are eliminated, Rikki-tikki will leave of his own accord or will be easier to hunt.  



"I will go, but there is no need that we should hunt for Rikki-tikki afterward. I will kill the big man and his wife, and the child if I can, and come away quietly. Then the bungalow will be empty, and Rikki-tikki will go."



Rikki-tikki overhears the conversation between Nag and Nagaina. Rikki-tikki feels it is his duty to protect the family, so he knows that he must kill Nag to eliminate the threat. That causes a further escalation in tensions because Nagaina wants vengeance. The plot continues to rise until the climax of the story when Rikki-tikki follows Nagaina down into her snake hole.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.