Skip to main content

In "My Son, the Fanatic" by Hanif Kureishi, who is the real fanatic in the end? Can Parvez be considered to be the fanatic, as well?

I think that Parvez is the real fanatic at the end of Kurieshi's story.


Parvez's fanaticism is seen in his frustration with Ali. His singular focus on his son's changes illuminates his fanaticism.  He is narrowly insistent on wanting his son to go back to the way he used to be.  Incapable of dealing with Ali's changes, Parvez is unable to think about anything else.  He is "unable to read the paper, watch television, or even sit down."  Parvez keeps "pouring himself drinks" because he cannot move past the fact that his son is different than before.  His inability to comprehend that Ali is different underscores his fanaticism.


However, Parvez's fanaticism is most evident when he enters his son's room. Parvez does not pause to observe his son praying.  He is so singularly focused on wanting to reach his son that he does not reflect for a moment that he should not bother a person in prayer.  Parvez's brutality underscores his unreasonable zeal:



Parvez kicked him over. Then he dragged the boy up by his shirt and hit him.  The boy fell back.  Parvez hit him again.  The boy's face was bloody.  Parvez was panting.  He knew that the boy was unreachable, but he struck him nonetheless.



Parvez is described in fanatical terms.  His use of violence, the intensity underscored in his "panting," and the fact that he clearly knows that there is no productive end to what he is doing, and yet does it anyway, describe a fanatic's state of mind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more