Skip to main content

From To Kill a Mockingbird, what would a letter from Scout to Arthur Radley say?

In chapter 31, Scout walks Arthur Radley home after he saves Jem's and her life from Bob Ewell's attack. Because Arthur doesn't speak to her, Scout has time to think of the many times Dill stood watching the Radley house hoping to get a glimpse of the man. Now, here she is walking the mysterious man to his own house in the dark of night. The thoughts she has on the walk could be great material for a letter from Scout to Arthur Radley because they highlight the indirect experiences they have had together as neighbors. First, Scout thinks about how average neighbors bring food and flowers when someone has died or is sick. Scout reflects on what she has received from her neighbor, Arthur Radley as follows:



"He gave us two soap dolls, a broken watch and chain, a pair of good-luck pennies, and our lives. But neighbors give in return. We never put back into the tree what we took out of it: we had given him nothing, and it made me sad" (278).



Because of this passage, it would be logical for Scout's letter to include a word or two of her gratitude for all of the things Arthur gave them in the knothole of his tree. She would probably apologize for ever believing Miss Stephanie Crawford's gossip about him and promise to praise his name all over Maycomb whenever she had the chance in the future; of course, she wouldn't mention his Halloween heroics, though, just to safeguard his privacy. 


Scout would also thank Arthur Radley for the blanket that he placed around her during Miss Maudie's house fire in chapter 8, for mending Jem's pants in chapter 6, and not becoming angry at them for anything they may have played in chapter 5. She would probably end the letter wishing Arthur Radley well and offering her services at any time he ever feels inclined to ask. Therefore, it would be a cute and heart-felt letter of appreciation mostly, with a neighborly offer to assist him with anything he might ever need in the future. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more