Skip to main content

What does the Constitution specifically say about the distribution of power between the state and national governments?

First of all, the Constitution specifies that the national government’s laws will be superior to those of the states.  That is, when state and national laws conflict, the national laws must win out and the state laws must be rejected.  This is found in Article VI.  That article says, in part, that



This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof … shall be the supreme Law of the Land.



This establishes the basic idea of our federal system, which is that the national government is superior to the state governments in those areas where it has the power to act.


But in which areas does the national government have power to act?  The Constitution specifically lays out powers that the federal government has and powers that it does not have.  The main place where the Constitution does this is in Article I, Sections 8, 9, and 10.   Section 8 lays out the enumerated powers that the national government holds.  Section 9 tells what Congress cannot do.  Section 10 tells what the state governments cannot do.  Thus, these three sections give us most of our information about how our federal system is to work.


Finally, the 10th Amendment tells us something about federalism as well.  It says that the states have any powers that are not specifically given to the national government and/or specifically denied to the states.  In theory, this means should give the states a great deal of power.  However, in practice, the 10th Amendment has had little impact on our federal system.


While federalism is a major part of our system, the word “federalism” is never mentioned in the Constitution.  Instead, the document lays out the basic ideas of our federal system in the passages listed above.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more