Skip to main content

Some political scientists argue that social capital is disappearing. What is social capital?

Social capital is our network or web of relationships with others that is of benefit to us. These can be formal, such as membership in a club or informal, such as a group of friends.  This can be a very loose arrangement, such as a group of neighbors who are acquainted with one another, or a closer arrangement, a person's one or two best friends. 


Benefits that accrue as a result of social capital are many and varied. When a distant relative told me her son was looking for a position as a teacher in St. Louis, I remembered that I had gone to law school with someone who had a successful practice there, and I checked with him and then passed on his name.  Networking, thus, relies on social capital to help one find work.  When my neighbors across the street went out of town, I offered to keep an eye on the house and take in the mail for them.  This social capital benefits both of us, giving me an opportunity to be helpful and them some peace of mind. When people are looking for funds for a cause, they call upon those whom they know to raise money, which capitalizes on their social capital.  There is social capital in a book group, which brings people together to discuss the books they read in common for the pleasure of the discussion (and usually a good snack, too.) All the various relationships we have create our social capital, whether we choose to call upon it or not.


I do not know if you are expected to write a response to that statement, but I must say I do not agree with it.  I suspect that the statement is based to some degree on how many people now choose to live alone and how many people build much of their social capital through social media.  However, living alone does not mean not having social capital.  Most people have it through their neighborhoods, their school or work, or through family.  And I am not convinced so far that building social capital by way of social media is any less effective that building it in person.  I see people who have never met one another reaching out and helping the other all the time, in ways tangible and intangible, on social media.  A woman I have never met in person, who is the cousin of a good friend, is my friend on Facebook, and she has invited me to stay at her house!  I think it is fair to say that social capital is evolving in many ways that none of us could ever have imagined even ten years ago.  


In another vein, I have also seen the term "social capital" used to mean the lingua franca that helps bring us together in our social discourse, so that one can count on people having read particular authors, having knowledge of certain kinds of music, and having tastes and preferences of a certain sort, so that conversations can be filled with allusions that are a shortcut conversationally, with references that others will be able to understand.  This sort of social capital does seem to be disappearing rapidly, with my generation (the baby boomers) seeming to be the last to use it. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...