Skip to main content

What are Cordelia's and The Fool's dramatic functions in the play King Lear?

The gentle, loving Cordelia is a foil to her two greedy, unloving sisters, Goneril and Regan. If Shakespeare had given Lear only the two heartless daughters, it would have suggested that all daughters are like these two. But that was not the playwright's apparent intention. Shakespeare had to have good characters to show that his view of humanity was not entirely negative. Kent, Edgar, Gloucester, Cordelia, and the Fool are all good characters.


The Fool's main function in the play is to serve as a companion and confidant of King Lear after the old man becomes disillusioned with Goneril and Regan and is also beginning to feel shame and regret for the way he treated his one sincere daughter because she refused to flatter him. Also, King Lear is supposed to have a hundred knights as companions and escorts, but Shakespeare could not show all or any part of such a large body of men on the stage. The Fool serves to represent Lear's retinue and to illustrate the kind of annoyance Lear causes Goneril with his boisterous and unruly followers. The Fool, in effect, represents all one hundred knights. But most importantly, Lear has to have someone to talk to when there is no one else present. Otherwise, Lear would have to indulge in many soliloquies. The audience cannot be looking at a character who is all alone on the stage and understand what that character is thinking, feeling, remembering, planning, etc. There has to be dialogue, and the Fool is used as an interlocutor. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more