Skip to main content

Which organelle can be found in plant cells, but not in animal cells?

Even though plant and animal cells both are eukaryotic cells, there are a number of differences between the two, especially in terms of the organelles that are present in them. Here is a brief listing of organelle that are found in plant cells, but not in animal cells:


  • Plant cells have a cell wall, while animal cells do not. The plasma membrane acts as the external wall or boundary of the animal cell.

  • Plant cells have chloroplasts, which enable them to do photosynthesis, while animal cells do not. Chloroplasts enable plant cells to make their own food. 

  • Plant cells have a very large vacuole. In comparison, animal cells have very small vacuoles. 

  • Plastids are present in plant cells, but not in animal cells.

There are a number of organelle, such as lysosomes, centrioles and cilia that are present in animal cells, but are (generally) absent from most plant cells.


Hope this helps.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.