Skip to main content

What is the major indicator that a chemical reaction has taken place?

A chemical reaction involves a chemical change. This means that the composition of products would be different from those of the reactants. In comparison, a physical change does not involve any change in the chemical composition of a material (although a phase change may be there).


There are a number of indicators that a chemical reaction has occurred. These include the following:


  • Exchange of heat with the atmosphere: A chemical reaction may be endothermic or exothermic. If the reaction requires energy to take place, then it is termed as an endothermic reaction. If the reaction produces energy, it is known as an exothermic reaction. Thus, energy exchange typically takes place during a chemical reaction.

  • Generation of gases: A number of chemical reactions involve the generation of gases. These may be observed as bubbles during the reaction.

  • Precipitate formation: a number of chemical reactions may also result in the formation of precipitates. 

Some of the other indicators of chemical reactions include a change in color, odor generation, etc.


Hope this helps. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more