Skip to main content

How can I make a lever better?

A lever is a simple machine which is used to move or lift heavier loads at the expense of relatively smaller effort. A lever consists of a bar and a hinged support, known as the fulcrum. The two ends of the bar, one where the effort is applied and the other one where the load is present, are known as the effort end and load end (or resistance end). The aim of the lever is to move or lift maximum load at the expense of minimal effort. The effectiveness of a lever is often described by a factor known as mechanical advantage, which is given as:


mechanical advantage = length of effort arm / length of load arm


The distance of the effort end from the fulcrum is the length of the effort arm. Similarly, the distance between the load end and fulcrum is the length of the load arm. 


A mechanical advantage of more than 1 is preferred, as it means more work is done at the expense of lesser effort. Thus, a better lever will have a higher value of mechanical advantage and for that we need to keep the fulcrum as close as possible to the load end. The closer the fulcrum is to the load end, the higher the mechanical advantage will be and the lesser the effort required will be.


Hope this helps. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more