Skip to main content

Why does Macduff refuse to tell Lady Macbeth about the murder?

Macbeth and his wife planned to be pretending to be sound asleep in their bed when Duncan's murder would be discovered. Macbeth, however, was forced to come down to the gate to find out why nobody was responding to the persistent knocking. The drunken Porter admits Macduff and Lennox just as Macbeth is arriving, so Macbeth finds himself forced to conduct the two men to King Duncan's chamber and stand outside with Lennox while Macduff goes inside to wake Duncan in accordance with the King's orders. When Macduff comes out and raises a great alarm, he is so overwrought by what he has seen that does not suspect anyone yet. Lady Macbeth is able to go through with the couple's original plan and put on an act of an innocent person who has just been awakened by the uproar. She asks,



What's the business,
That such a hideous trumpet calls to parley
The sleepers of the house? Speak, speak!     (Act II, Scene 3)



Macduff replies,



O gentle lady,
’Tis not for you to hear what I can speak:
The repetition in a woman's ear
Would murder as it fell.



He does not want to describe what he has just seen because he sincerely believes that Lady Macbeth is a gentle, innocent woman who could be so shocked and horrified that she would suffer a serious injury or possibly even death. At this point, Macduff believes Lady Macbeth has been asleep and that his outcry woke her. Macduff probably believes that Macbeth would have been sound asleep beside his wife if he hadn't awakened him with his knocking at the gate.


There is a sharp contrast between Macbeth and his wife's behavior. She does a much better job of acting innocent, surprised, alarmed, and aghast. She is not hampered by a guilty conscience or a code of honor like her husband. Macduff will have plenty of time later on to think about Macbeth's strange behavior from the moment he met Macduff and Lennox at the gate. Added to that will be the fact that Macbeth murdered Duncan's two attendants before they had a chance to argue their innocence, and the fact that Macbeth ended up becoming the new king. 


Lady Macbeth knows her husband will come under suspicion. She tries to help him out of a painful situation by pretending to be about to faint and calling, "Help me hence, ho!" Macduff is already becoming suspicious of Macbeth. He asks him why he killed the king's two attendants, and Lady Macbeth senses that her distraught husband is making himself look guilty by offering too much apology, explanation, and blatantly insincere rhetoric.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.