Skip to main content

Point of view affects characterization. From whose point of view is this story told? When furiously and furious both turn up in the first...

This story is told in third-person omniscient narration from Farrington's point of view. This narrator has access to all of Farrington's thoughts, and he focuses the story closely on the main character, following him from the office to the bar, back to the office, back to the bars, and finally to his home.


You could say that this unremittingly focused point of view is the main tool with which Joyce characterizes Farrington; the narration allows us to see how Farrington thinks, acts, and speaks throughout the unbroken description of his afternoon and evening.


At the same time, the third-person narration slightly distances us from Farrington, allowing the more erudite voice of the narrator to provide insight into Farrington: consider, for example, how Farrington looks at his boss's egg-like head, "gauging its fragility" and not "thinking about how he could maybe smash it."


When furiously and furious both turn up in the first paragraph, this is, of course, the author's contribution: Joyce carefully selected these words to set the tone for the story.


But more importantly, the character, Farrington, contributes the idea of fury: yes, objectively, there's a bell ringing, and yes, there literally is a voice shouting out a demand, but the story is focused on Farrington, who projects his own anger and fury onto everyone and everything around him. So to him, the bell sounds furious, and to him, the boss's demand sounds furious.


The question of whether this choice of words ("furiously" and "furious") belongs more to the author, to the narrator, or to the main character is a very fine point. It belongs to all of them, but it's Farrington himself who embodies fury.


This question also reveals the skillful way in which Joyce's third-person narration blurs its own lines, seeming to offer descriptions heavily influenced by the main character himself.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...